Two replies due Sunday night. Ten minutes each, and they still sound like you.
Tell the coach what your classmate argued and what you think. It drafts the reply in the shape graders score: the specific point, something new with a real source, a question. Then it grades the draft against the rubric and flags anything that reads like ChatGPT.
- A 100–150 word reply that opens with the specific point you are answering, adds evidence or your experience, and ends with a question.
- A real source with a verified DOI, cited in APA 7, with the reference list built from the journal's metadata.
- A rubric score per criterion and the exact edits to make.
- A check for the phrases professors associate with AI text.
- The AI-use disclosure line your university expects, and a transcript you can attach.
Built around the week your course already runs
- Mon–Tue
Read the prompt and the module.
- Wed–Thu
Initial post due: 250–400 words, 1–2 sources ≤ 5 years, APA 7.
Initial Post Builder
- Fri–Sat
Read classmates' posts, pick two.
- Sunday
Two replies due by 11:59 p.m.: 100–150 words each, substantive, often cited.
Reply Coach
- Monday
Graded by rubric: comprehension, engagement, timeliness, writing.
Rubric Check, before you post
Chamberlain and SNHU run eight-week terms with replies due Sunday 11:59 p.m. (initial posts earlier in the week); Walden counts Day 3 and Day 6; GCU spreads three replies across a Thursday-to-Wednesday week.
Three things it does, and one it refuses to do
Reply to a classmate
You paraphrase their point and say what you think. The reply opens with their specific idea, adds evidence or your experience, and ends with a question. 100–150 words, cited.
Free: one a week
Check against the rubric
Paste your own post. Each criterion is scored the way a strict professor scores it, with the exact edits to make, an APA check, and a DOI check on every reference.
Free: one a week
Build the initial post
The week's prompt plus your two or three theses become a structured 250–400 word post with two peer-reviewed sources from the last five years and the reference list built from their metadata.
With a subscription
It will not write from nothing. If you have not given it two points of your own, it asks you questions instead of drafting. That is the line every university policy draws, and it is also why the result sounds like you.
Inside the rules of your university
Student AI policies allow brainstorming, structure, APA help and feedback on your own draft, usually with a disclosure. They prohibit generated text and, at SNHU, pasting a classmate's post into any AI tool. The coach is built to those rules: your ideas first, a 400-character paraphrase field, verified DOIs only, the disclosure line in your school's shape.
Guides
- How to respond to a classmate's discussion post (with 12 examples)
The three-part reply graders score as substantive: name the specific idea, add evidence or experience, end with a question. Word counts and Sunday deadlines by university, 12 worked examples across nursing, business, psychology, education and social work, and what not to write.
Plans
One reply and one rubric check a week. No sign-up.
Replies, posts and checks without limit. Reminders, your voice, history.
The same, billed monthly.
One Chamberlain or SNHU term. No auto-renewal.
Subscriptions open after the free tool has been tested with the first students. Prices are the planned prices and may change before launch.